Rinelle Harper Addresses Native Chiefs at Family First Forum

This article was last updated on April 16, 2022

Canada: Free $30 Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…
USA: Free $30 Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…

The Winnipeg teen sexually assaulted and left for dead last month, 16-year-old Rinelle Harper, addressed the audience at the Canadian Museum for Human Rights for the first time since the incident. Ms. Harper highlighted the issue of murdered and missing aboriginal women and urged listeners to practice four virtues namely “love, kindness, respect and forgiveness.” Rinelle Harper survived the gruesome attack near the city’s Assiniboine River.

According to Ms. Harper’s remarks at the Family First Forum, i.e. an event organized by Manitoba chiefs to help address violence against native women, she mentioned that “I understand that conversations have been occurring all across the country about ending violence against indigenous women and girls.” She stressed that “I wish to continue on with my life, and I am thankful that I will be able to go back to school, to see my friends and be with my family.”

In addition to that, Ms. Harper is scheduled to address the Assembly of First Nations today. Her mother, Julie Harper, revealed on Monday evening that her daughter is still working on the speech she is slated to deliver on Tuesday at the AFN’s three-day meeting. The Nov. 8 assault almost made Ms. Harper one of more than 1,180 aboriginal women killed or gone missing in Canada between 1980 and 2012, i.e. a number collected from a recent RCMP report that has spurred renewed calls for a national inquiry into the problem.

Share with friends
You can publish this article on your website as long as you provide a link back to this page.

3 Comments

  1. CORP.CAN. TERRIFIED, DEHS; Cont’d…
    There are several reasons why some of these foreign corporate sponsors might be conscomment_IDered. They are:
    1) basically, to understand & perhaps prevent bullying despots from making secret arrangements whereby,
    in exchange for:
    a) the despots’ cooperation to endorse the last minute “new” &”improved” environmental & safety standards, etc. for their projects that may be derived from the C – CI Treaty, the EU – Canada CET Agreement, the TP Partnership, et al
    &
    b) the “protection” provcomment_IDed by the bullies for the potential foreign participants/ investors from the most vulnerable community members,

    the potential foreign participants/investors may exclusively & secretly reward the bullies financially & thereby, further legitimize the bullies power & control by way the bullies’ mechanisms of fear.

    2) some of the potential foreign participants are as disgusted with the “unethical” & “inhumane” arrangements of corporate Canada & their representatives in the government of Canada as many Native & non Native Canadians, et al, are. One potential participant sacomment_ID:

    “It’s not that we are racist when it comes to dealing with Canadians,
    it’s just that we can’t stand the way that you suck up to us”.

    That is to say; while corporate Canada & its political representatives “suck up” to the “coveted” foreign investor, the “Canadians” also “shi…”, uh, “purge down”. It may be regrettable that this bullying is just part of human nature?

    Our job is to comment_content_IDentify & to minimize, &/or, eliminate it.

    Therefore, while the most vulnerable Native community members may be looking for a much “better” deal that protects their rights to live & express themselves in the absence of fear, isn’t it reasonable to assume that they can also expect to start getting the aforementioned relevant information for their humble conscomment_IDeration, including The Compensation that is embodied in The W.A.D. Accord?

    So, does the “much better deal” by way of these “foreign” countries include:
    1) the elimination of the bullying by the information depriving despots,
    &
    2) enabling the employment opportunities that can equal those non Native Canadians & then use the “better deal” to shrink the financial disparity between:
    the 95% – 99% of the communities’ most vulnerable members
    &
    the 1% – 5% of the existing political & financial bullies, both; Native & non Native?
    &
    3) et al.

    But, aren’t the above reasons why The W.A.D. Accord (aka; The Australian Question) was developed in the first place? That is to say, The Accord was developed in order to ensure that the most vulnerable community members are getting the relevant information & are getting the opportunity to conscomment_IDer, to discuss, to ask questions about it, to improve, to create alternatives, to reject, etc., the information & questions in The Accord, including The Compensation that is embodied in it?

    By way of closing, now that Mr. Peters’ concerns about negative stereotyping have been lacomment_ID to rest, the most vulnerable community members, et al, might also conscomment_IDer some of the other areas of information that they are continuing to be deprived of that can be, &/or, are being abused by the the aforementioned bullies in order to strengthen their, the bullies’, “legitimacy” bescomment_IDes:
    1) the on going land settlements & treaty rights negotiations,
    2) the development of Aboriginal self-governance
    &
    3) et al?

    And, finally, how do you, the readers in North America, China, the European Union, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, think that these human nature issues can be redressed by The WAD Accord?

    I look forward to reading about your questions, your comments, your improvements, etc., regarding the above & the information listed below.

    Sincerely,

    Davcomment_ID E.H. Smith
    – Researcher
    -“Qui tam…”

  2. CORP.CAN. TERRIFIED, DEHS; Cont’d…
    And, therefore, in regard to the recent, June 5, 2014, comments by the grand chief of the Association of Iroquois and Allied Indians Gordon Peters about negative “stereotypes”, it has also been suggested that Mr. Peters needn’t be concerned as Native & non Native Canadians have made:
    1) the distinctions between the bullying despots & the most vulnerable community members
    &
    2) the distinctions between those chiefs & councils that want/need their community members to start getting the relevant information, including the information & questions in The WAD Accord & its Compensation
    and
    those chiefs & councils who need to keep their community members in the dark in order to supplicate the most “vulnerables” to limited beliefs & “hopes”
    and
    thereby, maintain, &/or, enhance their abusive powers.

    Perhaps, Mr. Peters can take some solace in knowing that he may be able to learn more about which bullying, information depriving despots are presently being “de-stereotyped”.

    Some of the chiefs & councils may even graciously admit that some of the more abusive aspects of human nature are being used & rationalized by despots by claims that the abuse of their power is based upon tradition, &/or, culture that excludes the comprehension of the abuses by non Natives. Doesn’t this suggest that unless you are in the position of being able to be bullied, etc., then you are incapable of, &/or, should be prohibited from helping those who are being bullied by provcomment_IDing the information & safe forums for the discussion, sharing, improving information, plans, etc. before they become a decision that are acted upon & the human costs are added up? There are many examples of this “helping” precedent in other human communities around the globe.

    The potential sponsors of this “helping process” understand the importance of comment_content_IDentifying, investigating, prosecuting & enforcing the prevention of the abusers from continuing their abuse. Similarly, the potential sponsors can assist the most vulnerable community members to ascertain the amount of compensation they are due for previous abuse. These sponsors who are being conscomment_IDered have also observed & understand that the political abuse of the RCMP is causing a great deal of morale problems within the non union service (see; Paul Palango; “Dispersing the Fog”). Therefore, it is for the aforementioned reasons that the potential sponsors would like to be conscomment_IDered to help the most vulnerable community members eliminate their fears & help the most vulnerable develop the natural resources that are accessed by way of the community’s lands. These are also the lands that have already been secretly “negotiated”, &/or, are in the process of being secretly “negotiated” within Canada by way of the despots & without the full due diligence sharing of the information with the most vulnerable community members.
    CORP.CAN. TERRIFIED, DEHS; Cont’d…

  3. [b]CORPORATE CANADA & its “FOREIGN” ASSOCIATES, TERRIFIED if Native Male Political Leaders Implicated in “Disappearing” Native Women’s Advocates. Prefers Limelight on “Race” not Shareholders’ Divcomment_IDends versus harmless NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native.

    The Flames of “Sort of RACISM”
    Haven’t The “Nationalistic” (Pre Global Economy) Corporate Canada & its Lobbied Politicians Done Rather Well via Fanning The Flames of “Sort of RACISM” & Feathering Their Nest to Enable Their SHAREHOLDERS & those of Their Assocs. to SUE the harmless NON Shareholders, both; Native & non Native in the Latest “Foreign” Treaties/Arrangements?

    Political Interference of RCMP to Continue?
    Corp.Can Desperate to KILL WAD Accord’s COMPENSATION for Depriving Native Canadians of Treaty Info Including CETA, TPP, C-CIT, NAFTA, Shareholders arrangements? More Political Interference of RCMP to Continue?

    HUMAN NATURE; How Cultures & Traditions can be used to explain Bullying & Info Deprivation to Protect the Power of “Death-Pots”. PREVENTION of RACIAL “STEREOTYPING” with DISTINCTION may HELP? [/b]

    After reading about the fears of retaliation of the Native Canadian women at the Special House of Commons Committee on Violence Against Indigenous Women, by powerful chiefs & councils for questioning & improving the chiefs/councils plans & decisions, etc., it has been suggested that it might be easier to minimize any potential for negative gstereo typingh of Native chiefs & their councils by:
    1) the most vulnerable Native community members (95% – 99% of the members of Native communities),
    2) non Native funders of Native communities
    &
    3) et al,
    by pointing out once again, but, with greater emphasis, that the most vulnerable community members, both; Native & non Native, are slowly & painfully becoming aware of the threat that is posed to the bullying, information depriving despots (Death-Pots) by way of the sharing of the relevant information, in forums that have eliminated the fear of retaliation.
    CORP.CAN. TERRIFIED, DEHS; Cont’d…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*