Jewish Group Commends Cheryl Misak for Supporting Jenny Peto

This article was last updated on April 16, 2022

Canada: Free $30 Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…
USA: Free $30 Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…

Independent Jewish Voices – Canada (IJV) applauds University of Toronto Provost Cheryl Misak for standing behind the student whose thesis on Jewish identity and Holocaust education programs has been criticized by some observers as being anti-semitic.

Quoted in the Toronto Star, Misak stated that “Freedom of inquiry lies at the very heart of our institution,” and insisted that “the best way for controversy to unfold is for members of our community to engage with the perspectives and arguments they dispute.”

Jenny Peto, who is Jewish herself, has been attacked in numerous articles as well as by Ontario Members of the Provincial Parliament for the masters thesis she completed in June 2010 which critiqued two Holocaust education programs, March of the Living and March of Remembrance and Hope. In the thesis, which was supervised and reviewed by several scholars, Peto argues that these programs work to “obscure Jewish privilege, deny Jewish racism and promote the interests of the Israeli nation-state”.

“Despite what is being said by former Canadian Jewish Congress president Irving Abella and Ontario citizenship and immigration minister Eric Hoskins, both of whom have attacked the thesis, we believe that Peto is asking difficult questions which warrant serious consideration and debate,” says IJV spokesperson Sid Shniad. “The University of Toronto is right to stand behind her.”

“The attack on Peto,” says Shniad, “is designed to stifle discussion and debate about controversies related to the exploitation of the Holocaust by supporters of the State of Israel, labelling them anti-semitic and fomenting a climate of hysteria. The view that the Holocaust has been misused to justify Israeli actions has been the focus of research and discussion by an array of respected scholars,” Shniad declared. “Peto’s work is situated squarely within that tradition.”

Share with friends
You can publish this article on your website as long as you provide a link back to this page.


  1. I am just curious as how this can be conscomment_IDered scholarly as she openly admits to not interviewing member representing the March of the Living or the March of Remembrance and Hope (–u-of-t-slammed-over-jewish-racism-thesis).
    She attempts to become a martyr, whining as her thesis as attacked, marking it as smear campaign by ” right-wing, pro-Israel groups and indivcomment_IDuals,” yet in reality is is simply poor academia.

  2. What’s your evcomment_IDence for “poor academia”? Have you read the text? If yes, can you be more specific? What factual and reasoning flaws you are referring to? In no, your comment_content is irrelevant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.