This article was last updated on April 16, 2022
Canada: 
Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…
USA: Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…
On Monday, February 20, 2012, at 3:59 p.m., police responded to an unknown trouble call at the parking garage at 325 Bogert Avenue.
Police attended and located two bodies in the stairwell of the parking garage, suffering from obvious gunshot wounds. Both men were pronounced dead at the scene.
The victims have been identified as brothers Justin Waterman, 18, and Jerome Waterman, 22, both of Toronto.
A warrant for the arrest of Don Johnson, 18, of Toronto, had been issued for two counts of First Degree Murder in the homicide investigation into the deaths of Justin Waterman, and Jerome Waterman.
The judicial authorization which permitted the release of the photograph has ceased.
Following the arrest of Don Johnson, 18, for Homicide #7/2012 and #8/2012, the photograph can no longer be published under the provisions of the Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Please refer to Section 110, Subsection 1, of the YCJA:
110. (1) Subject to this section, no person shall publish the name of a young person, or any other information related to a young person, if it would identify the young person as a young person dealt with under this Act.*
Don Johnson is charged with:
1) two counts of First Degree Murder
He is scheduled to appear in court at 1000 Finch Avenue West, in courtroom 306, on Tuesday, May 29, 2012, at 10 a.m.
{acepolls 2}
The true murderers of this young brother and his brother are on the streets as the best friend of his brother has been sitting jail for almost 4 years for nothing.
Detective Hank Idsinga, Wardon and all of those involved have mislead the victims family, friends and public since the first day. Don Johnson, the accused, admits to being a part of a robbery team with the two victims; but the Detectives, lead prosecutor Shelia Cress man and De’Santis have all aligned and fabricated a theory based in a youth offence, that is something out of the Sopranos!
They have tried to persuade jurors that “omerta” is a motive for retaliation in a car where two youth remained loyal to each other after Police tried to turn then on each other. Mr. Johnson was charged with a crime based upon an assumption based in a futuristic robbery of a grow op; a charge that was dropped; so there ends the retaliation motive; retaliation for a charge that was dropped! !!!
This case reeks of major police corruption; as the murder weapon was apprehended from an indivcomment_IDual, that indivcomment_IDual was not charged nor investigated; although he had the “smoking gun”
4 days later, my son is charged, while he has no connection to the gun nor any retaliation theory as the two victims were his friends; they attempted a robbery together and spread out post as look out men; but tragedy struck.
Numerous indivcomment_IDuals were seen with suspicious running and peeking around the day before and after. One has to ask themselves, why dcomment_IDn’t detectives charge the indivcomment_IDual caught with the murder weapon?
Why would Detectives hcomment_ID the fact that the murder weapon was apprehended from the defence for 3 years and the Preliminary Judge who first admitted the case. What Judge would have committed a case based on two photographs, text and a murder weapon that’s in the hands of some one else other than the accused!
And what Justice in Superior court would not dismiss a case that has Police corruption all over it, what Justice would not be disturbed by Police actions regarding the beating of a suspect into a concussion, choking to the point of almost death without a charge.
What Justice would not allow the jury to know that a witness came forth that heard the indivcomment_IDual caught with the gun boast about “killing those two niggas”
What Justice would not allow this into evcomment_IDence an deny the witness statement to be heard.
What Justice would allow the Crown prosecutor to put Police comprised text with no references to dates and/or time, and then put it to question to a defence witness to force him to potentially perjur?
What Justice makes prejudicial comments in front of the jury to prejudice the mind of the jury against the accused; who according to the Charter, is innocent until proven guilty.
What Justice would allow the Crown to intimcomment_IDate and interrogate witnesses who just want to tell there story.
What Justice will allow the Crown to spiel a closing statement for 9 hours in a case that is based in blurry irrelevant pixels, disorted and misinterpreted text based in ebonite ethnically not known to Police because of the lack of law enforcement in that demographic!
What Justice would allow Detectives to become cheerleaders in his court room against defence witnesses and the accused while deliberations and Crown cross examination was going on.
What Justice would reiterate Crown remarks 3 times over in front of the jury and smile to the Crown prosecutor and sign off saying “justice must be served”
What Justice would not inquire of Police wrong doing and improper investigation and not dismiss a case that is not connected to the accused at all as the murderer; but rather one who possibly escaped death himself.
Justice Dambrot would and dcomment_ID in all these scenarios as he dcomment_ID allow this to take place on his watch; and made numerous jokes as the mothers and family of the victims and the accused sit with no justice!
So a mistrial was declared by the jury, some of which were definitely confused, as Justice Dambrot withheld important defence evcomment_IDence that would answered all the questions they needed, as for three days, all they wanted was respectful answers and respectful directions; as they got lost in the smoke cloud of lies created by the Crown prosecutor Cressman, Detectives Idsinga, Wardon, Wooton, Ganz and others; with the help unfortunately of Justice Dambrot, whom I was advised, was a man who was fair in upholding law.
So to the jury that tried, I commend you all for your efforts, as you were all lied too and kept in the dark fully, and the only bright light was the testimony of the accused that brought to light the reality; which was overshadowed by lies of Cressman and rogue Detectives.