Ex-Principal Terry Baytor of Martingrove Collegiate Institute charged with fraud in Toronto

This article was last updated on April 16, 2022

Canada: Free $30 Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…
USA: Free $30 Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…

On Monday, November 8, 2010, police charged a man in connection with a theft and fraud investigation dating back to 2005.

It is alleged that:

– the accused was the Principal at Martingrove Collegiate Institute between 2002 and 2009,

– he set up an account specifically for student funds, having signing authority on the account,

– between January 2005 and December 2009, he paid himself $16,000 from the student fund account.

It is further alleged that

– between 2005 and 2009, the accused would make only partial deposits into the account, stealing approximately $72,500.

Terry Baytor, 58, of Brampton, has been charged with:

1. Theft Over $5,000,
2. Fraud Over $5,000.

He is scheduled to appear in court at 2201 Finch Avenue West, on Wednesday, December 22, 2010, room 202F, 1:30 p.m.

Share with friends
You can publish this article on your website as long as you provide a link back to this page.

6 Comments

  1. WOW!!! GRIMEYYYYYYY…mi thought him always givin students money for hot dogs and timbits was odd…damn wonder who snitched him out.

  2. [quote name=”dwiz beats”]damn wonder who snitched him out.[/quote]

    In the CP24 article, it is reported that the interim principal saw the discrepancies and reported them.

  3. whether guilty or not, The funds were mismanaged by this principal– no accountability and spending as he saw fit. not right.

  4. NO EFFIN WAY DID BAYTOR DO THIS. I go to Marintgrove and know baytor very well. He was an excellent principal and if he dcomment_ID take the money it must have been for a good cause. He would never pocket the money for selfish needs. He is inoccent untill proven guilty

  5. [quote name=”Shaun”][quote name=”dwiz beats”]damn wonder who snitched him out.[/quote]

    In the CP24 article, it is reported that the interim principal saw the discrepancies and reported them.[/quote]
    That is actually incorrect; It was a mistake on the part of the initial news services who reported the story. The discrepancies were found by a routine inspection of the books. Mrs. Robinson had nothing to do with it.

  6. [quote name=”Christina”]whether guilty or not, The funds were mismanaged by this principal– no accountability and spending as he saw fit. not right.[/quote]
    You can’t just use certain language like that; it is not a hard and set fact that he mismanaged the funds, it is merely an allegation. He is innocent until proven guilty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*