What Factor Has Prolonged America’s Unemployment Problem?

 

Here is a graph showing how the international trade deficit has blossomed since 1997:

 

From a low of $130.6 billion in 1997, the United States trade deficit with the rest of the world grew to a peak of $558.5 billion in 2006, a 327 percent increase.  In 2014, the trade deficit was $514.6 billion, the fourth highest level on record.

 

Here is a graph showing how the number of U.S. workers employed in manufacturing has dropped since 1997:

 

At its peak in 1998, 17.56 million American workers were employed in the manufacturing sector.  This dropped to a low of 11.528 million in 2010, a drop of 6.032 million workers or a loss of 34.4 percent.

 

Prior to the 2000 – 2001 recession, the manufacturing sector has typically regained most, if not all, of the jobs lost during a recession as shown on this graph which shows both the number of unemployed Americans and the number of Americans employed in the manufacturing sector:

 

As you can see, from 1950 to 2000, the number of Americans employed in the manufacturing sector remained between 13 million in 1950 and 19.5 million in 1979.     

 

Things changed substantially around the turn of the new millennium when the number of manufacturing workers began to decline as you noted on the graph above.  This is particularly the case since the Great Recession.  On this graph, you will notice that, even though the number of unemployed Americans has decreased substantially since the end of the Great Recession, the number of Americans employed in the manufacturing sector has barely budged:

 

The number of Americans employed in the manufacturing sector hit a 60 year low of 11.4 million in early 2010 and has risen to only 12.35 million in mid-2015, an increase of less than 1 million manufacturing jobs.

 

The rising trade deficit and dropping manufacturing employment shows that United States manufacturers are losing jobs to manufacturing industries in other nations, particularly China.  For example, here is a graph showing the net trade value in goods with China since 1992:

 

When China entered the World Trade Organization inDecember 2001, it was touted by U.S. politicians as a game-changing deal for the American economy as shown in this speech given on March 8, 2000 by then-President Bill Clinton:

 

"Last fall, as all of you know, the United States signed the agreement to bring China into the W.T.O. on terms that will open its market to American products and investments.

 

When China concludes similar agreements with other countries, it will join the W.T.O. But, as Lee said, for us to benefit from that, we must first grant it permanent normal trading status, the same arrangement we have given to other countries in the W.T.O. Before coming here today, I submitted legislation to Congress to do that, and I again publicly urge Congress to approve it as soon as possible.

 

Again, I want to emphasize what has already been said. Congress will not be voting on whether China will join the W.T.O. Congress can only decide whether the United States will share in the economic benefits of China joining the W.T.O. A vote against P.N.T.R. (Permanent Normal Trade Relations) will cost America jobs as our competitors in Europe, Asia and elsewhere capture Chinese markets that we otherwise would have served." (my bold)

 

That said, in the first ten years after joining the WTO, China has accomplished the following:

 

– it is the world's second-largest economy in GDP terms.

– it is the world's largest merchandise exporter.

– it is the world's fourth largest commercial services exporter.

 

This is what happened to China's GDP and GDP per capita between 2001 and 2010:

 

This is what happened to China's manufacturing industry between 2001 and 2011:

 

One last question in closing this posting.  Wouldn't America's ongoing real problem with high unemployment (not the headline unemployment statistic touted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics) be quite easily solved if America was still a manufacturing stronghold?  Unfortunately, recent moves by China that allowed its currency to devalue during the recent economic "near-miss" to make China's exports less expensive and imports less attractive to consumers , it is highly unlikely that there will be any meaningful change in the number of Americans employed in the manufacturing sector any time soon.

Click HERE to read more of Glen Asher's columns