Now that Julian Assange has been forcibly removed from Ecuador's embassy in London, it is a good time to look back at a ruling by the High Commissioner of the United Nations Human Rights office.
Here is the press release in full:
As background to the rulingn, here is what the United Nations had to offer:
"Mr. Assange was arrested on 7 December 2010 in the United Kingdom, pursuant to a European Arrest Warrant issued against him after he was accused of sexual misconduct in Sweden. That accusation has not been substantiated and after he was interrogated in London the Swedish Prosecutor decided in 2017 not to pursue the investigation.
Mr. Assange has been de facto arbitrarily deprived of his liberty since 2012 without charge or trial. He was first detained on remand and in isolation for 10 days in a prison in London; he then spent 550 days on bail terms constituting house arrest, pending his appeal before the UK’s Supreme Court against his extradition to Sweden. When the Supreme Court upheld the extradition decision, he sought political asylum in the Embassy of Ecuador on 16 August 2012, citing fears of being extradited from Sweden to the USA. He claimed that he had reasonable grounds to believe that should he be extradited to the USA, he would face trial for having published, through Wikileaks, thousands of US classified diplomatic cables and documents. Ecuador granted him political asylum and later Ecuadorian citizenship.
As a result of the Swedish Prosecutor’s decision not to pursue the investigation against Mr. Assange, the European Arrest Warrant against him was nullified. The remaining ground for arresting him is his violation of the terms of the bail in 2012, when he walked to the embassy of Ecuador to seek political asylum. The terms of bail included reporting daily to the local police station.
The UK authorities have made it clear that should he leave the Ecuadorian Embassy he would be arrested. An arrest warrant has been issued against Mr. Assange by a British court, and police have been assigned since 2012 to stand-by 24/7 at the embassy gate to arrest Mr. Assange should he exit the diplomatic premises." (my bolds)
Just think of the money that has been spent to "police" Mr. Assange 24 hours a day since 2012.
As noted in the press release, the United Nations Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention adopted this Opinion on Mr. Assange in December 2015. In its Opinion, the Working Group noted that arbitrary deprivation of liberty occurs in the following five cases:
"1.) When it is clearly impossible to invoke any legal basis justifying the deprivation of liberty (as when a person is kept in detention after the completion of his sentence or despite an amnesty law applicable to him) (category I);
2.) When the deprivation of liberty results from the exercise of the rights or freedoms guaranteed by articles 7, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and, insofar as States parties are concerned, by articles 12, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 26 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (category II);
3.) When the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character (category III);
4.) When asylum seekers, immigrants or refugees are subjected to prolonged administrative custody without the possibility of administrative or judicial review or remedy (category IV);
Mr. Assange was granted political asylum by Ecuador on August 16, 2010. Since then, he has remained in a small, single internal room in the Ecuadorian embassy. At that time, Sweden refused to recognize the granting of asylum and insisted that Mr. Assange be extradited to Sweden with no guarantee that he would not be moved to the United States. The Working Group found that Mr. Assange's detention was arbitrary as follows:
"The deprivation of liberty of Julian Assange is arbitrary and in contravention of articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and articles 7, 9 (1), (3) and (4), 10 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It falls within category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group."
Let's close with this final commentary from Julian Assange from September 2018 prior to his access to the internet being cut:
It is highly likely that Mr. Assange will face legal persecution far beyond the punishment that the United Kingdom's legal system will impose for his violations of the terms of his bail which included daily reports to a local police station for a Swedish charge that was dropped. Mr. Assange, who has never been accused of publishing anything that was not entirely truthful, is now experiencing what happens to whistleblowers who present all of us with the painful reality of today's world.
Click HERE to read more from this author.