This article was last updated on April 16, 2022
Canada: 
 Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…
USA: 
 Oye! Times readers Get FREE $30 to spend on Amazon, Walmart…
The Netherlands Minister of Finance, Jan Kees de Jager finally found  the solution to keep the Dutch bankers honest. He proposed that all  employees of banks will take an obligatory oath, stating that they will  always keep the general interest and the interests of their clients at  heart. Receptionists and cleaners to be excluded from this obligation,  which is a pity as there is a lot to clean up at the banks.
  
The Minister made this proposal a day after the Dutch parliamentary  commission investigating the banking crisis and the nationalization of  ABNAMRO, published its report. This commission studied for one and a  half years on the way the government handled the crisis, consulted many  financial experts, and came up with a lot of proposals to restructure  the sector, but they overlooked the simple solution of the oath. The  Minister made himself the laughing stock of most commentators, although  some point out that the oath would broaden the base for legal  proceedings in case of any future wrong doing.
  
Even Che Guevara realized that in order to establish a  communist/socialist order on revolutionary Cuba he would have to create a  “new man”, who would put the general interest before personal gain.  Although Cuba was full of believers at that time he was not very  successful, to say the least. One must admit that he did not have a big  chance to create his new men as the younger generation, the sons and  daughters of the party elite, left the island by the hundreds to study  capitalism first hand.
  
If Jan Kees de Jager is the ultimate believer in the possibility to  create a “new man” by introducing the obligatory oath for bankers, he  has my blessing. Personally I feel that a restructuring of the financial  sector in The Netherlands requires the introduction of more checks and  balances. “Ring fencing” of general and investment banking and foremost  the improvement of the quality of the supervisors, which failed so  dramatically in the run up to the banking crises.
  
Its not only the banks which had problems with the supervisors. When  privatization was the hype in the 1980′s many government activities have  been privatized or semi-privatized, meaning that the responsibility  remained with the government, but the execution was put in the hands  “independent” organizations. As a consequence many highly paid jobs were  created for managers and supervisors, some of them handling substantial  amounts of public money.
 Recently Vestia, the largest Dutch corporation in charge of social  housing, came under investigation by the state prosecutor. Vestia  invested part of its capital in derivatives with ABNAMRO and Deutsche  Bank and this bet went wrong, leading to huge losses and the departure  of the general manager to Bonaire. Of course with a golden parachute. It  so happens that the Chairman of the Board of the supervisory  organization of Vestia (Centraal Fonds Volkshuisvesting),  is also  Chairman of the Supervisory Board  (Raad van Commissarissen) of ABNAMRO.  By chance? I don’t know, but it gives such an ugly impression  especially as this gentleman is a member of eight other supervisory  boards of commercial and financial organizations, besides the two I  already mentioned.
 One wonders if  The Netherlands can avail of so few capable financial  experts that we find the well paid supervisory functions concentrated  in the hands of so few.
 As far as Vestia is concerned, the question remains who will pick-up  the tab after the irresponsible betting on derivatives. Not ABNAMRO nor  the supervisors, but a rent increase for the tenants of Vestia’s houses  is being contemplated!
 Click HERE to read more from Oye! Times.
Article viewed on Oye! Times at www.oyetimes.com
You can publish this article on your website as long as you provide a link back to this page.

Be the first to comment